20 Best Cushioned Running Shoes For Women (2023 Updated)

The Cloudstratus has been my to-go running shoes for the past 4 years! The previous model felt comfortable out-of-the-box, had a wide toe box and a breathable upper material. Because the outer material of the toe-box was made of a thin plastic layer, it was also resistant and offered protection when hitting my foot onto something hard.

The shoes were not the lightest but the cushioning was excellent, and it was great for long-distance runs! On recently upgraded the shoes and launched the new generation of the Cloudstratus. When I heard they had removed some of the protective and stability material to ditch some weight from the shoes, I was a bit skeptical and afraid that my new pairs would last less and that I would not like them anymore.

So far, I stand corrected: these shoes are still very comfortable, out-of-the-box. The heel cage is a bit shorter but still offers a quite secure feeling. The upper material is still very breathable but is now covered with a bit more resistant lining.

The combo with the double CloudTec cushioning (the two layers of holes that you can see) and the sturdy Speedboard offer a cushioned, yet responsive run. There is less rubber in the outsoles than in the original version of the Cloudstratus.

I always used all the rubber in the front and back of the shoes, but this happened beyond the time I had to switch them for new shoes. I purchased the new White – Green – Black colour and it looks super pretty.

However, it has gotten stubbornly dirty after a few rainy and wintery runs. I highly recommend these shoes if you are looking for cushioned and comfortable long-run shoes.

I purchased the shoe for a half marathon. I wanted a cushion shoe that was lightweight. I recently switched to this brand after wearing Brooks for the last 3 years (On Cloud short distance). Not unhappy with Brooks, just wanted to try new technology.

I like the lightweight shoe and thought I might like the version with more cushion. Plus with the RRS 90 day guarantee you can’t lose! This was a good decision as the feel and cushion are perfect. I am 5-10, 190 pounds, and run mostly 10k or half.

I am also 65 years old so protecting against injury is a priority. My only negative is the shoe color is kind of ugly.

I’ve been running in Hoka One One’s for years (Clifton’s, Challengers and currently Bondi 7). I’ve always liked their very comfortable cushion ride but rarely liked their “look”. I tried On shoes a few years ago and although I loved their look, they just didn’t have the cushioning that Hoka’s had.

I love the look of the CloudStratus and since it’s On’s “most cushioned” shoe, I decided to give them a try. Initial impressions were good. Walking around, they felt very comfortable. However, as soon as I started to run, I felt the stiffness immediately in the front/mid foot area.

I even switched to more cushioned insoles (Soft Sole) and I could still feel the stiffness. Maybe they will break in after some mileage, but I didn’t want to wait to find out. especially at the high price point.

I’m older (almost 55), run 20-25 miles a week as part of my cross training and consider myself a “heavy” runner; thereby have always loved cushioned shoes. These just didn’t work for me.

I really wanted to like this shoe. I was looking for something I could use for Orangetheory, where I would run 1. 5-2. 5 miles, four times a week, in addition to rowing and mild strength training. Working out intensely, stomping on these shoes with all-outs, it led to intense shin splints (which I’ve never had before) and bruising on my heal.

The shoe feels like concrete once you lift the super thin sole insert up. There was absolutely no cushion to soften my stride, nor arch support. The other downfall with this shoe is that it has absolutely no breathability so if you live in a hot climate like I do it will feel wildly uncomfortable.

When I added a much needed sole insert, it added even more heat insulation, and it felt like I was running with plastic bags wrapped around my feet. It was then I knew I needed to return the shoe. I’m just so thankful to rei for having such a stellar return policy.

I’ve been wearing my On Cloud running shoes for a few weeks now and believe I’ve logged enough miles to give a pretty fair review of them. Aesthetically I love them and they’ll probably become my go to travel sneakers.

The slick black style can easily go from workout to casual wear and very much like that. Immediately I noticed that they are not as cushioned as my traditional running shoes which I normally wear a Brooks or Asic.

On Cloud does makes a more cushioned version but it’s not this pair. I prefer low socks or no socks and even after being broken in I find that they still rub the back of my ankles not to the point of blisters or bleeding but noticeable irritation.

I’ve caught two rocks in the unique sole design. I’ve seen review were people complain a lot about getting rocks stuck. I don’t think it’s extremely common but it will happen. They’re a well made shoe and I look forward to continuing to wear the pair I’ve purchased, however, for the price I guess I was expecting a bit more.

This is my second pair. I notice On was phasing this specific style out, so I went ahead and bought a backup pair. I have massive feet pain from years of wearing heels and running marathons and for a while, after a hairline fracture, I thought I’d never run again.

Every shoe hurt, even brands I’d run in before: Saucony, Brooks, whatever. Normal sneakers hurt me too, just walking around/shopping/etc. On the recommendation of a friend, I actually bought the first pair just to walk around on a 2 week trip in Europe, and I couldn’t believe how unbelievably light they were.

They weight almost nothing and after they gave me zero pain during the Europe trip, I decided to try to run in them and lo and behold, no pain. I tried other models of Cloud running shoes, and these were the most comfortable for me.

(Sorry for the length, but these were Awesome!) After a lot of research into the best athletic shoes for a few of the physiological (foot and back) issues I have, I decided to try Brooks instead of my lifelong go-to of NB.

Due to high arches and my active lifestyle, I developed Morton’s Neuroma between my second and third toes, which causes ball of foot pain, tingling, and eventual numbness. I also suffer from lower lumbar spinal stenosis and cannot walk on concrete or other hard surfaces for any distance/length of time without developing a back ache or painful spasms.

Recommendation, without going to plain orthotic shoes, was to have maximum arch support, roomy toebox, and plenty of cushioning. Brooks provides all of these features. I was able to walk for a few hours upon the first time wearing them, and I did not suffer the pain and tingling at the ball of my foot, nor did my feet ache in my arch area! Additionally, my back was not in pain; this was a first in years.

Amazing! I definitely recommend these for anyone with foot issues like Morton’s Neuroma, high arches, or plantars faciatis and painful back problems such as spinal stenosis. (At least, they helped my lower lumbar area, but I cannot verify cervical stenosis assistance.

) Finally, I normally wear 8. 5-9, M width. I order 9 in athletic shoes due to feet sometimes swelling after long hikes/walks, as well as allowing warmer, thicker socks. Brooks, size 9M, fit perfectly and give enough room for all of my needs!.

Full disclosure: I just use these for walking, not running, so I can’t speak to their performance there. But for my needs, they’re great. I was looking for a wide sneaker that would accommodate my orthotics but not look like bricks on my feet (ahem Hokas).

I also need a fair amount of cushioning because of an injury. I was so happy that these met both criteria while looking like an everyday sneaker! Also love that they’re (marketed as) carbon neutral! Yay Brooks! A note about sizing: I tried these on in a store in my size, 8.

5, and they were a good fit, but the store only had blue and I wanted all-black. Altitude thankfully had them in stock (and hooray for the member discount!) but when they arrived, the 8. 5 felt small.

So I exchanged them for a 9, which fits great. Don’t know if that’s the case for just the all-black vs blue but thought I’d mention it for the sake of other buyers!.

I was so excited when I saw the fantastic colors on this shoe. However I was tremendously disappointed with the lack of quality and how uncomfortable it was. I have serious back issues and neuropathy in my legs and feet.

These are the only sneakers I can wear. The cost is always an inconvenience so I have to look at it as an investment for my health. In person the shoe simply looks cheap. Then when you put it on it is hard and no support or cushion.

I was crushed that I had to return these. I ended up buying another pair of the ghost 13’s in mens. I didn’t like the color selection but at least I knew that they fit and are comfortable. Please go back to the ghost 10, 12 or 13 format.

Quit cutting corners in making a new version. The new colors and offering more options in wide for women is the way to go. I have 3 pairs of ghosts but if you don’t improve your future models you will be losing a customer and that makes me sad.

Absolutely love these shoes, I actually do not want to take them off! Decided to give them a good few tests before reviewing. I have been running in Mizuno the past 8-9 years (previously Brooks) but the two most recent Mizuno pairs were awful to wear because they would not accommodate my orthotics as other models previously had – not enough height to fit them in and so they were super tight.

I decided to go back to Brooks (after finding some physiotherapist reviews recommending them if you need orthotics) and am so relieved I did. The D width is liberating for my wider foot and the height of the shoe is excellent.

They are also super comfy and perform brilliantly on my modest 5km runs, as well as for sprints. Traction has been great on rainy footpath runs and the shoe dries out quickly. Couldn’t be happier with them.

I’ve had the Bondi X for a few weeks and generally run between 6-15km per run 3 times a week. I consider myself a casual runner (for the past 12 years), generally fit and in my mid 40’s. In addition, I have previously used the Bondi Clifton (500km plus) so I can now compare the two.

I found the Clifton extremely spongy and soft and after running beyond 15km’s, I get pains on the outer side of my knee area in which I couldn’t figure out why until a friend suggested that perhaps my shoes did not give enough stability.

I didn’t have this problem with the Bondi X and the only reason I can put it on is that the carbon plate is likely stabilizing my ground contact and hence my knees are not suffering. On short fast running days, I feel the shoe becoming responsive (not as responsive as the Clifton) as I change my running style but I feel the Bondi X at best for long distance (12km plus).

The biggest negative about this shoe is that terrible tongue – its very short and I have to often stop and pull them back up. On long runs, it the tongue goes under the laces and its very annoying. Other than that it’s a good neutral shoe that offers a bit of stability.

I wanted to wait to write this review so I can give an honest one. It’s been about 2 months of wearing these and I am obsessed!! I run about 35-50 miles a week and these have helped my knees and my ankles.

The cushion is next level and the flow of my runs are great. They do alleviate some of the pounding from the sidewalk. Running on Asphalt is even better with these HOWEVER, here comes the con. these do get Little Rock’s stuck in the bottom of the shoe where the X is.

You can feel the rocks every time you step. So that’s a bit annoying but definitely not a deal breaker. My other con is the tongue of the shoe. depending on my socks, the tongue bothers the top of my foot- I find myself having to bed down and move the tongue around.

This doesn’t happen often though, only with short socks. but be aware of that. I also changed out the laces to bungee laces and this changed the game. I want to add that I was nervous about the shoe being too bulky because of the wing on the back.

They do look bulky when holding the shoe but you don’t feel the bulkness of them while running. Overall, I will say these have been one of the best running shoes I have owned and I will likely keep buying these for years to come.

I was just in NYC a few weeks ago. Needless to say there was a lot of walking. Towards the end of the trip, between my lumbar my lumbar being compressed and my my foot with it’s arch falling, I was in extreme pain during the last part of my trip.

I started looking online for better shoes and came across reviews for the Hoka One One show. I checked online in NYC, but nothing was close by. When I returned home, I knew I was going to look around in SD right away.

The night I returned from the trip, I started thinking about which stores would carry them. I thought of Footwear etc. , since the shoe is APMA approved. I went to check the mail and as fate would have it, there was a Footwear etc.

catalog. I checked the web site and Footwear did carry the shoe. I decided to visit Footwear the next day and see this shoe in person. From the second I put on a pair of these shoes, My pain went away in my feet and lumbar spine.

It was instant gratification and I was in love with them. I read reviews that they can help with not just foot problems, but back problems too. I was bouncing between this style and the leather ones.

I opted for this because of summer. I read reviews that walking in these shoes is like walking on a foam mattress. Honestly that is probably the best description for them. They are so light and comfy.

I really wish I had these when I was in NYC. I guess I will have to walk a lot in SD to appreciate these. You don’t have to take my review, I highly recommend that you try these out yourselves. Especially if your spine is degrading as bad as mine and multiple vertebrates are compressing.

I love these shoes so much that I am going back to get the black leather pair and maybe another color too!.

I ordered these shoes less than one month ago. At first, the feel is incredible. Great arch support and I couldn’t wait to take them on a run. The first treadmill run sold me as they really do put energy back in your step, but that’s where the good feelings ended.

After run #1 (4 miles) I noticed the logo on the inner heel was already wearing off. not a good sign. Fast forward to less than 50 miles ran on these shoes and a hole is developing in both heels and the stitching is coming loose in the tongue.

I’ve heard that quality is an issue with these shoes and those rumors are correct. I want to love these, but they are just too poor of quality for me to consider buying another pair.

After buying a pair of the Coudventure and really liking the fit, comfort and quality I decided to give their road running shoes a try. I own and have worn running shoes from all the major brands and now after getting in several runs in with the Cloudswift they are my go to running shoes.

They are relatively light at 11. 4oz/323g in my size 46 and that is light for a non-racing shoe. I have an average width foot and these fit just right with just enough room in the toe box and I have no problem getting in a good lockdown.

The ride is stable and responsive without being too soft ( I like cushioning as a heel striker but do not like squishy shoes ) I would say these are comfortable firm. I have no trouble picking up the pace if I want to and going around corners or down steep hills is not a problem.

I am a neutral runner but find that shoes like these with some support help by gate and rhythm. At this time I am a convert and after switching shoes on various runs to compare with the Cloudswift I just reach for these every run, and have donated several other gently used shoes to the local thrift shop.

I absolutely love my oncloud tennis shoes. I saw a friend and her Mom both wearing the black/pearl color combo and was obsessed with how COOL they looked on; I asked if I could try my friend’s on to get an idea of sizing and decided to order myself a pair online.

I’d say they run just slightly small; I wear a 7. 5 pretty much across the board in all types of shoes so that’s what I ordered. The onclouds fit perfectly without any socks or with a SUPER thin sock on, but if I wanted to wear my normal cotton/padded running socks I definitely would’ve needed to buy the size 8.

I’ve never had tennis shoes that were this comfortable, and I get compliments on them everywhere I go. I’m already considering buying a second pair for work. These are my new favorite shoes!.

I was the biggest ON avocate for years before the were popular. The cloudrunner (defunct line) was the thing dreams are made of. They took away my back and knee pain. Why did those not sell well? They were god aweful ugly.

They then went to the cloudcruiser. These looked great and had the same some (different foam desity than the runner I believe), but the upper was so poorly made I would put dime size holes in them within a month (wore 3 pairs).

I wore the 1st pair of cloudrunners for almost 3 years, well after I should have been out of them. The cloudsurfer survives, but only in look as the latest line fixed the issue of pushing your forward when standing and would tear out a front loop in a couple of months.

The cushioned feeling on those new shoes is gone though. I have turned to see the alternatives and purchase the cloudace, cloudstratus, and cloudflow to hopefully fill the hole in my heart. None have succeeded and these are the worst of the shoes I’ve tried.

The cloudace and cloudstratus are definitely for running only and you can tell as the stratus is slanted forward and the ace has a very curved bottom so you can’t find a spot where much of your foot is sharing the load of your bodys’ weight at any given time.

At least those shoes had nice cushioned insoles (though insole material will break down quickly). These cloudflow shoes, like the title says, feel like walking on bricks. My wife also had a pair and said they weren’t as comfortable as the old cloudsurfers (by a lot in my opinion) and they broke down quickly.

I’m done with ON. I can’t afford $150 for pair of shoes that last 3-4 months. I am a casual runner and probably 20 lbs over weight. I’m not olympic athlete. If you can’t build a shoe for me I need to find a new brand that will.

I use to walk on average about 20k steps a day in 2019, but due to pain in knees and my right foot, I stopped walking outside. For the record, I wear prescribed orthopedic insoles in all my athletic shoes when walking; unfortunately, it didn’t matter what tennis shoe I put on, I would have pain.

Therefore; I stopped walking outside and started working out inside my home and doing chair exercises. In 2020, I visited my doctor’s office, I noticed he had on these all black beautiful tennis shoes; I asked him about them, and he told me how much he loved his shoes.

I immediately ordered me some waterproof running shoes by “ON. ” Instantly I noticed how comfortable they were, I kept them on all day; I saw a definite reduction in both knee and foot pain. I finally got enough nerves to walk outside again.

they are by far the most comfortable athletic shoes I have ever worn. I am ready to order my second pair.

As someone who, while in my pre-fatherhood days of logging 75+ mile weeks at paces typically between 6:00 and 6:30 per mile, is just getting back into running, the Clifton 7 was my default place to start after taking over a year off.

My last experience with the Clifton line was the 5 (I have worn every edition other than the 6), the improvements to the upper and weight reduction were a strong positive. Unlike many other reviews, I actually preferred the responsive foam reformulation in the 4 and onwards as opposed to the overly soft 2 and 3, as it was more durable and gave more bounce through the lifecycle of the shoe.

The 7 picked up right when I had left off but has a more open upper with a gussetted tongue, something sorely needed in every version sans the OG. My only concern with 75 miles in is the longevity as the sole is showing a decent amount of wear.

I have heard the 8 outsole was reconfigured to increase durability so I am looking forward to my next pair for comparison. However at this point the wear seems to be mostly cosmetic and has not effected the traction or midsole cushioning.

I use the Clifton 7 for my daily runs, longs (I alternate the 7 and the Mach 4 for long runs) and recovery runs. Other than speedwork, as there are much better options for that case use purpose IMO, the Clifton 7 remains what the Clifton has always been about, a supremely cushioned and comfortable ride for logging a ton of miles at an incredibly light weight and a variety of paces.

The questions over durability are the only reason I am not giving 5 stars, but RR Sports was, as they always are, wonderful to deal with!!.

I absolutely LOVE my Clifton 7s – best athletic shoe I’ve ever worn. I have problem feet/ankles/knees/hips due to rheumatoid arthritis and my 7s made walking for exercise SO much better. I loved them so much that I wore the soles down and the treads off, so I began looking for a replacement.

My local running store did not have the Clifton 8s in stock in my size, so I tried the Bondi, but they didn’t work for me. The store clerk suggested I order the Clifton 8s in my size directly from the Hoka website.

I was super excited to get my new shoes, but SO disappointed when I tried wearing them. The 8s are SO different from the 7s! THE GOOD: The only positive change is that the laces of the 8s are shorter (I always had to double or triple tie the laces of my 7s so as not to trip on them).

The outer sole still seems to offer good cushion. THE BAD: There’s something about the heel that feels stiff, thick and irritating, and just doesn’t fit comfortably for me like the old one. Also, the lining fabric is slick and sweaty/not breathable.

The worst changes, though, are in the toe box. The toe box is too narrow – and I do not have a wide foot. When I stepped forward, I could feel the edges of the insole irritating the edges of my feet where the insole and shoe meet at the sides of my feet.

Adding to this discomfort is the fact that the laces of the 8s start further toward the front end of the shoe than in the 7s, which caused the first lace to cut off my circulation at the base of my toes making the top of my foot tingle.

I tried loosening the laces, but then my foot was too loose in the shoe. I’ve sent them back for a replacement and am going to try the same shoe in a wide, just to see if it’s any better though the toe box, but I don’t have my hopes up too high.

I really hope the next version is improved!.

Read this if you’re a runner and don’t know if you need to size up! After a 10 year hiatus from distance running, I decided to pick up running again and needed new running shoes. Honestly, there are so many options out there I didn’t really know where to begin.

I just want to run a few miles a week so I didn’t want to spend a lot, but wanted something that offered good support because I’m not getting younger. I checked major sport sites and these shoes seem like they’re the most popular for a mid-price range.

As I’ve had zero experiences with Hoka before, I wasn’t familiar with their sizing. I read reviews on multiple sites and it was a mixed bag – some said they ran big, some said small, some said wide, and some said narrow.

I checked all the size charts and they weren’t particularly helpful, either. For reference, I am a solid US women 8 in most shoes – sneakers, heels, boots, sandals. Width wise, I am average – not narrow, not wide.

I’ve never gotten wide shoes in my life, but certain shoes like Converse do feel tight after walking for a while. For running shoes, I always sized 1/2 size up. I used to wear 8. 5 in Asics with thick running socks.

Anyway, I filtered down the reviews to those who mentioned running and it seemed like most runners suggest to get your regular size instead of sizing 1/2 size up as you would with most running shoes.

So I decided to get a size 8 in regular/medium width. With modern technology, I was able to pick up the shoes from a local sporting goods store 20 minutes after ordering. I tried them on in the car and knew I made the right decision – there was some wiggle room from my big toe and the width felt perfect.

Even if I wore thick running socks, it should still be a comfortable fit. Once I got home, I went for a 1 mile run and they felt fine on asphalt/concrete. Obviously, it’s too early to tell if they’re actually right for me, but I’ve had running shoes that immediately hurt, and these didn’t do that.

I am excited to see how these will hold up!.

I like that there’s a questionnaire to help you find the right type of shoe for yourself. This helped me to select the Clifton 8 with high arch support which is wonderful. It’s the first time that I’ve had athletic shoes where I didn’t have to buy a special insert to give me the support I need.

I also like the higher back heel design because I have to use a heel lift inside my shoe due to a leg length discrepancy. I have to add a half inch heel lift under the insole. Since your insoles are rather thin, I wore these around the house for a bit before venturing out in them to make sure that I could tolerate the edge of the heel lift which I normally don’t feel under my other insoles.

Not too bad. Also having the extra high back on the outside is great because if the back of the shoe behind my heel is too low after putting in the lift, it causes problems with the shoe slipping off of my heel.

That is not the case for these shoes. Finally wore them to the gym and all I can say is the cushion is great, support is great and I had no heel slipping out of the shoe. So far, so good. I’ll have to wear them a bit more to make sure these are as great as everyone says.

Looking forward to continuing to try these out and hoping that I like them enough to buy a pair for normal every day walking. Was also a little apprehensive about the mostly white color but I’ve already gotten compliments on them.

The pattern with the blue is pretty cool.

This was not the 1st Hoka I had tried on but this was the first I ended up buying and loving. When I ordered this shoe, it was after becoming more serious about increasing my weekly mileage and starting to train for a half marathon.

After finding out that my real shoe size was a size down but in a wide, my options were limited. I wanted minimal drop coming from NoBull trainers and Altras. I had never purchased a shoe with this much cushioning thinking that I didn’t need that but when I started to add to the weekly distance, I really started to feel it.

The Clifton’s were an immediate positive change. From the first day running in them, I have no more foot pain. The amount of cushion took a few miles to get accustomed to. Upper: light an breathable.

No weird rubbing or pressure points on my 9. 5 2E. Heal counter kept me in the shoe with a runners knot. I appreciate the gusseted tongue. I did not experience any weird or unwanted foot movement inside of the shoe.

Midsole: I do like the cushion for those high millage weeks or those slow steady runs. I would not recommend this shoe for speed work only because there are so many lighter options. I would not term the shoe as “heavy” though.

I do also like how full contact the sole is. To be clear, this is not a “bouncy” sole which I prefer on long runs. I want something to shield me from the abuse and that is exactly what the Clifton has been able to do for me.

Overall: Great workhorse of a shoe that can take the mileage. The Clifton renewed my interest in the brand so much that I purchased a pair of Rincon 3’s as well. With my overall pleasure in the purchase, my wife has also make a Hoka purchase.

This is my third pair of Under Armour HOVR sneakers that I’ve purchased within the last 18 months 🙂 I buy only Under Armour HOVR sneakers ever since discovering they have built-in Bluetooth. I do 20,000 steps a day so having Bluetooth makes it a breeze to track steps.

This pair is the most comfortable/supportive and they’re super light so it feels like I’m walking on a cloud! The only thing I would warn others about is the colour of the sole/tongue, I thought it was a rose gold due to it’s appearance on my computer monitor but they’re in fact a light purple/pink.

I bought them anyway and have no regrets :).

My default go to was another brand of running shoes and have owned like 6 Pairs. The HOVR is my first one veering off that tested path as I try to change from my heel strike to a forefoot strike. I am impressed by the shoe and the tech it carries.

If you are that stage where you understand CADENCE I would highly recommend this shoe. Even if you are a beginner or just after a good looking shoe this won’t disappoint you. But if you are a runner looking to improve your technique then look no further than the Machina.

I know these are running shoes but I always wear them anywhere I go. It’s just so comfortable. I can connect the underarmour app with my shoes since these shoes have blue tooth that you can connect to your phone just to check how many calories you are burning, what exercise you are doing.

That’s amazing. These shoes are also suitable with the shape of my feet. So if they are good for me, it doesn’t mean they are good for you. You guys still need to find shoes suitable for the shape of your feet.

First Time, Bought a Running Shoe From Decathlon Binnypet. Not Satisfied in terms of Fit, Cost & Style. The Lace is Too short which leads Knot the lace uncomfortably. Frustrated after bought. 2 years warranty only cover the Name and not shoe.

The seller in Decathlon told that the warrant is Void if we use Outside. Running shoe is not to wear in home. The seller didn’t have sense it seems. No One agree his/ Decathlon T&C. Better to think before buy.

I request Decathlon don’t hide any T&C behind the “2 years warranty” and Please Provide Lengthy Lace to make Knot Comfortably.

I have never been so disappointed with a product from Decathlon. First of all these shoes has a very poor quality insert sole, the insert sole cloth started peeling off from first use itself and after a week or so it is completely gone.

Secondarily, both the shoes has a different and weird feel to the feet, they are kind of slippery from inside and doesn’t give you the confidence to run/ walk. At first I thought it would take some time to get used to the feel but it is just getting more and more uncomfortable with time.

Plus these two weeks also leads me to the point of no return I guess as I have used them quite a bit for running. I don’t know if it would be returned or not, but please don’t waste your money and time in this product.

I bought this product in march, Within less than a 2-3 month time period, this product is damaged perfectly. Stroble sock is displaced. Not perfectly glued. There is major damage on outside part. And I only used these shoes just for walking purpose.

Not even used for a single time for running. Still this is damaged. Now j hope that store will provide me a new pair of shoe as per their warranties.

I always buy the same rotation of running shoes and wanted to try something different. This sneaker is light, fluffy and feels great running outside or on the treadmill. It does run a tad on the small side – but I stick with my usual 8.

5 and it’s comfortable. Would consider sizing up depending on how you like a sneaker to fit. Will buy again!!.

Order your normal size, perfect fit. Comfortable for being on your feet all day. Stylish, have gotten so many compliments!!! Love these shoes & would buy again. I’ll never buy another brand again!!!

These shoes are very comfortable! I put my inserts in them and I don’t have any plantar fasciitis issues. I wish they had more colors. They may run a tad small but this could also be preference too.